<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The impact of energy and climate change policies on a household energy bill in 2020</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.decc.gov.uk/2012/01/12/the-impact-of-energy-and-climate-change-policies-on-a-household-energy-bill-in-2020/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.decc.gov.uk/2012/01/12/the-impact-of-energy-and-climate-change-policies-on-a-household-energy-bill-in-2020/</link>
	<description>Department of Energy and Climate Change Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 14:51:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: peter dublin</title>
		<link>http://blog.decc.gov.uk/2012/01/12/the-impact-of-energy-and-climate-change-policies-on-a-household-energy-bill-in-2020/#comment-47248</link>
		<dc:creator>peter dublin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 18:11:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.decc.gov.uk/?p=1123#comment-47248</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[1. Relevantly  lowering energy use and emissions and saving money for consumers:
State control of grids within which private service providers compete openly and fairly.
Competition - with whatever emission parameters one desires - 
ensures lowest efficient energy use by providers to keep down their own costs  and prices for consumers (Ceolas.net)

2. Irrelevant energy efficiency policy:
Energy efficiency regulations on  buildings, washing machines, light bulbs etc.
Stimulated Market Competition, or Taxation that can help pay for price lowering Subsidies on alternatives, are both better than regulations  (exemplified with light bulbs, http://ceolas.net/#li23x):
Not just to keep choice, and not just to lower energy use and emissions, but again, to do so at the lowest possible cost to government and consumers - and regardless of whether one is a right wing (market) or left wing (tax) politician.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. Relevantly  lowering energy use and emissions and saving money for consumers:<br />
State control of grids within which private service providers compete openly and fairly.<br />
Competition &#8211; with whatever emission parameters one desires &#8211;<br />
ensures lowest efficient energy use by providers to keep down their own costs  and prices for consumers (Ceolas.net)</p>
<p>2. Irrelevant energy efficiency policy:<br />
Energy efficiency regulations on  buildings, washing machines, light bulbs etc.<br />
Stimulated Market Competition, or Taxation that can help pay for price lowering Subsidies on alternatives, are both better than regulations  (exemplified with light bulbs, <a href="http://ceolas.net/#li23x" rel="nofollow">http://ceolas.net/#li23x</a>):<br />
Not just to keep choice, and not just to lower energy use and emissions, but again, to do so at the lowest possible cost to government and consumers &#8211; and regardless of whether one is a right wing (market) or left wing (tax) politician.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The mystery of the anti-wind farm report that is not anti-wind farm &#124; RenewaBlog</title>
		<link>http://blog.decc.gov.uk/2012/01/12/the-impact-of-energy-and-climate-change-policies-on-a-household-energy-bill-in-2020/#comment-47139</link>
		<dc:creator>The mystery of the anti-wind farm report that is not anti-wind farm &#124; RenewaBlog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 04:29:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.decc.gov.uk/?p=1123#comment-47139</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] DECC spokesman later pointed me to its brightly coloured blog, which effectively explains its statement – if only Calor Gas had looked there first, it could [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] DECC spokesman later pointed me to its brightly coloured blog, which effectively explains its statement – if only Calor Gas had looked there first, it could [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D Macdonald</title>
		<link>http://blog.decc.gov.uk/2012/01/12/the-impact-of-energy-and-climate-change-policies-on-a-household-energy-bill-in-2020/#comment-29529</link>
		<dc:creator>D Macdonald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 20:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.decc.gov.uk/?p=1123#comment-29529</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[O dear! Why do I believe the top line additional cost (tax) and not have any faith in the expected bottom line &quot;savings&quot;? Could we not all just change TV&#039;s per Product Policy, forgo all the rest and save £158 per year?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>O dear! Why do I believe the top line additional cost (tax) and not have any faith in the expected bottom line &#8220;savings&#8221;? Could we not all just change TV&#8217;s per Product Policy, forgo all the rest and save £158 per year?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
